I Obtained a Trial Covid-19 Vaccine. Do I Nonetheless Must Put on a Masks?

I Got a Trial Covid-19 Vaccine. Do I Still Have to Wear a Mask?

Let's take a look at some more factual considerations. Specific antibodies target specific segments ("epitopes") of a protein. Top American vaccine candidates that focus on the coronavirus spike protein may not give you as many antibodies as those produced by someone who was actually infected with the virus. The virus is more than its tips. And acquired immunity is not just created by the antibodies in our serum. These are white blood cells, such as B. Killer T cells that have actually been trained to deal with the threat. As my medical colleagues remind me, recovered Covid-19 patients can be expected to have cellular immunity that some vaccines may not induce. (A few vaccines, especially one for HPV, may produce a better immune response than natural infections, but usually the other way around.) Based on the data available, a well-funded vaccine candidate appears to produce only a weak cellular response. It may still work wonderfully, but the test tube results are no substitute for the field results. And what is expected of a good vaccine is to reduce your chances of getting infected (albeit in a way that, once vaccination is widespread, can lead to herd immunity), not to eliminate it.

Even if your optimistic assumptions have been confirmed, you should wear a mask with others in public places. After all, people won't know why you're not wearing one. They may conclude that you are an anti-mask or fear that you may pose a threat to them. At the same time, you would be undermining an important social norm. No matter your personal risk profile, wearing a mask signals your support for a practice that can save lives. It helps maintain a public space where we all do our part to contain transmission. For the same reason, you should continue social distancing in public places.

Don't give up hand hygiene either. In theory at least, your hands could transfer the virus from one surface to another's hands. So washing your hands regularly remains a good idea. (With added perks when we get into the usual cold and flu season.)

None of this means that, with all restrictions in mind, you should not participate in the permitted activities you mention, such as eating out and traveling. Decreased economic activity negatively affects the well-being of many, including health costs. Will these treats be a reward for the good deed of being a guinea pig? I wouldn't see it that way. However, this would be a positive contribution to the recovery.

I realize that the decision to eat out in this time of massive upheaval and lost livelihoods is already a great privilege. My dilemma concerns the conditions in which to do so is ethically appropriate (masked, of course, outdoors, and six feet from other guests). On the one hand, I recognize that those who work in restaurants (bar, front of house, line chefs, etc.) are likely to work because they are dependent on those wages i.e. H. You have to. On the other hand, I realize that they would probably prefer to work remotely, as can those privileged enough to have the option, and I don't want to support this tiered pay scale system. I also acknowledge that right now it's important to help keep local business going – both owners and employees who rely on wages to support themselves. Eating out seems just as problematic as eating out, as those who prepare the food are equally at risk. How would you think through the ethical approach? Name withheld


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here